When it comes to design tools, few can beat the popularity or the usability of AutoCAD. For more than 30 years, AutoCAD has been the best and perfect solution for designers and firms including Australia, United States, Canada, European nations and almost everywhere. In fact, it is difficult to contemplate a design process without the presence of CAD. However, Autodesk, the company behind AutoCAD, has also released another similar program called Revit. Usage of Revit technology is becoming a reputable Architectural practice in Australia and United States.
This has most certainly created more than its fair share of confusion among professionals. After all, many feel that both applications are similar enough not to merit a shift to Revit. On the other hand, there are others who advocate a shift to Revit from AutoCAD services for architectural firms as soon as possible for a number of reasons. It becomes important to understand the similarities and differences between these two applications before coming to a decision.
Both of these applications are meant for design purposes which means that there are quite a few similarities between the two. AutoCAD and Revit can both be used for making 2D plans and drawings. They can also be used for 3D modeling although a few tools do vary slightly between the two. When it comes to rendering, again, both perform quite well.
The major difference between the two is in Building Information Modeling or BIM. In short, AutoCAD allows the basic geometry to represent the real-life objects. In Revit, the geometry gets equipped with information from real-life. Therefore, Revit is better for modeling purposes while AutoCAD excels in the area of precise 2D drawing.
The fact is that Revit has become essential for modern design purposes due to the importance of BIM. Therefore, it becomes necessary CAD conversion to Revit, temporarily or permanently. The reasons for the shift are many, some of which are given.
More and more clients require Building Information Modeling in their projects. As the demand for BIM grows, the need for Revit modeling becomes increases as well. Therefore, a shift to Revit needs to be done sooner than later.
When all the work is being done with Revit, the documentation process becomes much smoother and more precise. With Revit, it becomes easier to covert 3D models to 2D drawings without any loss of accuracy or data. All changes will be automatically synced. The construction documents can be easily converted into high quality renderings for presentations without the need for extra effort or separate processes. Moreover, many repetitive and boring drafting tasks become automated with the help of this application. This leads to an overall improvement of efficiency. Additionally CAD conversion of files to Revit through import is quite easy.
Shifting to Revit modeling as a standard Architectural practice in Australia, United States and elsewhere has become more or less a necessity. Clients and designers everywhere are giving preference to BIM and 3D modeling, both of which are the strong suits of Revit. However, that does not necessarily mean that AutoCAD services for architectural firms will no longer be needed as they have their own advantages.